Knowing agricultural water needs and consumption means that WWE can estimate historic depletion to the waters of the state caused by growing foodstuffs and grazing lands. For instance, in 1984 and 2003, we handled water rights studies on the Arkansas River to make sure that other interests did not transfer more water out of the basin than it deserved. We also analyzed the hydrology to ensure reasonable protection for the remaining farmers and ditch companies.

In the landmark Hankins v. Borland case, WWE proved that rainfall drainage from agricultural land was greater than from natural vegetation. Supplemental irrigation water aggravated conditions for downstream entities. This engineering work established drainage principles for use by Colorado cities. 

The determination of agricultural consumptive use is essential to the development of reliable estimates of the amount and application-rate of water needed to support crop growth. In addition to the application of consumptive use studies in the analysis of irrigation projects, these studies can play a key role in the evaluation and implementation of water rights acquisitions and/or transfers. 

Scope of Services

• Water supply
• Water rights
• Canal and reservoir hydraulics
• Surface water hydrology
• Groundwater hydrology
• Soil classification and evaluation
• Groundwater recharge
• Consumptive use
• Aquifer water quality
• Drainage
• Water transport

Representative Clients 

• Catlin Canal
• Kansas Livestock Association
• L.G. Everist
• San Juan County, N.M.
• Grand Valley Canal
• Orchard Mesa
• Adolph Coors Company